PHIL482 Philosophy of Psychology: Subjectivity (3 credits).

 
Prerequisite: six credit hours in philosophy; one of which must be PHIL280 or PHIL366.

 

TuTh: 12.30-1.45 pm, Skinner 1112.

 

Instructor: Peter Carruthers.              pcarruth@umd.edu                 Office hours: TuTh 2-3.

 

 

1.         Course description

 

Consciousness has been described as a ‘final frontier’ for science, comparable to the problem of the origin of the universe; and explaining consciousness has been called ‘the hard problem’. Some people deny that consciousness can be explained; and some claim that consciousness shows the inadequacy of functionalist and/or physicalist accounts of the mental. Others have attempted to explain consciousness in natural terms, but there are heated disputes about the kind of explanation that is needed. This course will examine a range of recent approaches to consciousness, looking first at skeptics about its explicability, and then focusing especially on attempts to provide a naturalistic theory. The aim of the course is to introduce students to these debates, and to encourage them to engage with those debates in a sophisticated and knowledgeable way.

 

All of the texts to be used in the course are accessible on-line at:

http://consc.net/online.html

This is an immense resource, containing almost a thousand papers on the philosophy of consciousness (as well as many on the science of consciousness). Some judicious additional reading within it should be done when preparing the term paper and final exam essays.

 

The course will follow the tentative schedule outlined in #3 below. The reading associated with each session should be studied in advance. The instructor will present some of the highlights, and will explain some of the more difficult ideas, but a significant proportion of each session will be devoted to class discussion. To be effective, this requires advance reading.

 

2.         Course requirements

 

Grades for the course will be based upon one term-paper and the final exam. The term paper will be worth 50% of the grade, and each of the two final exam essays will be worth 25% of the grade. The term paper will be written on one of the topics discussed in the first half of the course (prior to Spring Break). The exam essays will be written on topics discussed in the second half of the course (after Spring Break).

 

The term paper is due on Friday April 6. Papers should be submitted electronically as a Word or WordPerfect attachment to the instructor’s umd email address. Term papers should be between 4,000 and 6,000 words in length. Under-length papers will be penalized. The instructor will cease reading over-length papers at the point where he judges that they exceed the word limit. For term paper topics, see #4 below. Unexcused lateness will be penalized at a rate of one third of a grade per calendar day. (Weak excuses will not be accepted, and in any case excuses need to be presented in advance.)

 

All students will need to prepare a detailed one-page (single spaced) abstract of their intended paper. This will be presented to the instructor for discussion and feedback in a one-on-one meeting during the week of March 12 (before Spring Break) or March 26 (after Spring Break). A schedule of meeting times will be circulated in class and then posted on the instructor’s door (Skinner 1125). Students who fail to present an abstract during the above weeks will have their grade for the term paper reduced by one full grade letter (e.g. from A- to B-).

 

The final exam will be pre-released in the final regular class of term (Thursday May 10). It will consist of half a dozen or more essay questions, from which students will need to select two. The two essays should be prepared in detail in advance, and then written out into two separate exam books during the final two-hour exam. You may not, however, bring any papers or books into the exam. Exam answers will be graded anonymously (by folding back the cover sheet and shuffling), so do not write your name within the exam booklet itself.

 

3.         Schedule of topics and readings

 

To access the required reading for a given session, click on the appropriate link. Note: changes might be made to this schedule and/or the required readings as the course progresses. If so, an email notification will be sent out.

 

Session 1 (1/25): background: the case for physicalism

Peter Carruthers, The nature of the mind, chapter 5 (read only the first two sections)

 

Session 2 (1/30): continuing with physicalism, then blindsight

Lawrence Weiskrantz, Blindsight reconsidered

 

Session 3 (2/1): two visual systems

David Milner and Melvyn Goodale, The visual brain in action (precis)

 

Session 4 (2/6): global broadcasting

Bernard Baars, In the theatre of consciousness

 

Session 5 (2/8): creature-consciousness, state-consciousness, access-consciousness, phenomenal-consciousness, and more

David Rosenthal, State consciousness and transitive consciousness (read only the first two sections)

 

Session 6 (2/13): kinds of consciousness continued

Ned Block, On a confusion about a function of consciousness

 

Session 7 (2/15): the knowledge argument

Thomas Nagel, What is it like to be a bat?

Frank Jackson, Epiphenomenal qualia (with excerpts from “What Mary didn’t know”)

 

Session 8 (2/20): responses to the knowledge argument

Michael Tye, Knowing what it is like: The ability hypothesis and the knowledge argument

 

Session 9 (2/22): on zombies

David Chalmers, Self-ascription without qualia: A case-study (on zombies)

Daniel Dennett, The zombic hunch: Extinction of an intuition?

 

Session 10 (2/27): the explanatory gap

David Chalmers, Facing up to the problem of consciousness

 

Session 11 (3/1): consciousness: physical but irredeemably mysterious?

Colin McGinn, Consciousness and Space

 

Session 12 (3/6): the gap as illusion

Michael Tye, Phenomenal consciousness: The explanatory gap as cognitive illusion

 

Session 13 (3/8): explaining the explanatory gap

Peter Carruthers and Benedicte Veillet, The Phenomenal Concept Strategy

 

Session 14 (3/13): does conceivability entail possibility? is dualism the only option?

David Chalmers, Consciousness and its place in nature (in support of dualism)

 

One-one meetings with the instructor to discuss an abstract take place during  this week.

 

Session 15 (3/15): reply to Chalmers

Christopher Hill, Modality, Modal epistemology, and the metaphysics of consciousness  (read the first 12 pages, sections I and II)

[ Stephen Yablo, Consciousness and Concepts ]

 

Spring Break

 

Session 16 (3/27): Representational theories of consciousness

William Lycan, Representational theories of consciousness

 

One-one meetings with the instructor to discuss an abstract take place during this week.

 

Session 17 (3/29): First-order representationalism: Dretske

Fred Dretske, Experience as representation

 

Session 18 (4/3): First-order representationalism: Tye

Michael Tye, Representationalist theories of consciousness           

 

Session 19 (4/5): non-conceptual content (discussion will be led by Vincent Picciuto)

Michael Tye, Nonconceptual content, richness, and fineness of grain

 

Term papers are due on 4/6

 

Session 20 (4/10): Inner sense theory: Lycan

William Lycan, Consciousness as internal monitoring

 

Session 21 (4/12): Higher-order thought theory: Rosenthal

David Rosenthal, State consciousness and what it’s like

           

Session 22 (4/17): Dispositional higher-order thought theory: Carruthers

Carruthers, Phenomenal Consciousness, chapter 9

 

Session 23 (4/19): Same-state monitoring theory: Kriegel

Uriah Kriegel, The same-order monitoring theory of consciousness

 

Session 24 (4/24): Dual-content theory: Carruthers

Carruthers, Dual-content theory: the explanatory advantages

 

Session 25 (4/26): Multiple drafts theory: Dennett

Daniel Dennett & Marcel Kinsbourne, Time and the observer: The where and when of consciousness in the brain

 

Session 26 (5/1): Multiple drafts continued: time and the observer

Daniel Dennett & Marcel Kinsbourne, Time and the observer: The where and when of consciousness in the brain

 

Session 27 (5/3): animal consciousness and sympathy

            Carruthers, Suffering without subjectivity

 

Session 28 (5/8): animal consciousness and comparative psychology

            Carruthers, Why the questions of animal consciousness doesn’t matter very much

 

Session 29 (5/10): issuing of exam questions and review

 

Final exam: Thursday May 17, 1.30-3.30 pm.

 

4.         Term paper topics

 

Write your term paper on one of the topics listed below. Be sure to include only what is necessary to answer the question: irrelevance will be penalized. However, your answer should begin by laying out the different kinds of consciousness, making clear which kinds are under discussion thereafter.

 

1.         Explain and evaluate the “knowledge argument”. Explain how you think that argument should best be responded to.

 

2.         Is there an “explanatory gap” between all physical, functional, and intentional facts and the facts of phenomenal consciousness? Is the gap a genuine one, or somehow illusory?

 

3.         Are zombies really conceivable? What (if anything) would follow for the metaphysics of consciousness if they are?

 

For general advice on writing philosophy papers (and exam answers) go to the Department’s undergraduate resources page:

http://www.philosophy.umd.edu/deptwebsite/undergraduateprogram/resources-undergrad.html

 

You should be scrupulous in avoiding plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty. For the campus’ code of academic integrity, see the following page:

http://www.shc.umd.edu/code.html

 

5.         Assessment policy

 

Grades will be assigned in accordance with the following criteria. There are eight broad dimensions of assessment:

  1. presentation and literacy (including spelling, grammar and punctuation);
  2. structure and organization (papers should have a beginning, middle and end, and should work towards a clear goal in a systematic fashion);
  3. clarity (ideas and arguments should be explained clearly and fully);
  4. relevance (all and only material relevant to answering the question should be included);
  5. understanding (a good understanding of the material under discussion needs to be displayed);
  6. quality of argument (give strong arguments, and avoid invalidity);
  7. knowledge / use of sources (how much you know about the subject matter, and how well you have researched it);
  8. independence and critical stance (the extent to which you evaluate and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the ideas under discussion for yourself).

 

For purposes of averaging and calculating final grades, the following conversion will be used:

A+: 98, A: 95, A-: 92, B+: 88, B: 85, B-: 82, C+: 78, C: 75, C-: 72, D+: 68, D: 65, D-: 62, F: 0-58

Missing work will be assigned zero. Note that this will have a very significant effect on your overall average grade.

 

You should note that undergraduate grades issued at the University of Maryland have recently followed roughly the following distribution at levels 300/400:

A:  ±45%        B:  ±30%        C:  ±15%        Other (D, F, W):  ±10%

This normal distribution will be borne in mind when assigning the grades for this course.

6.         Disabilities and Religious observances

 

If you have a disability of any sort that requires some accommodation to be made in the arrangements for the course, you should inform the Instructor at the start of the course, who will then consult with the University’s Disability Support Service.

 

It is your responsibility to inform the Instructor of any intended absences for religious observances in advance.

 

 

Enjoy !